.@cppib A patient investor with a long horizon: Expected Average Hold for #infrastructure assets (utilities, transport, energy, of which ~77% r in North America, & rest in Latin America) - is 20y+; & even for #PrivateEquity for > 5y; compared to industry avg < 3y! (2016 Ann Rep) pic.twitter.com/uDgH6yPCby
Interestingly, ‘long-term orientation’ is also a national cultural variable that correlates well w/ good #SovereignWealthFund governance. Aggarwal & Goodell (2017) @ClevelandFed@uakron develop & confirm six hypotheses on SWF good governance; also finding them consistent... pic.twitter.com/YF7FOn8ypt
…w/ a governance ranking developed by Bagnall & Truman @piie using a survey ?aire (4m which #Top10 shown above) #China’s avg national SWF governance score of 67 placed it 17th among 33 countries (& 49 funds) ranked. #Canada’s indicators r averaged over 4 funds (not just @cppib).
The #BoE working paper compares #OLG model simulations with #Rstar estimates from Holston, Laubach, Williams 2017 @federalreserve@sffed as below, and projects a further 37bp decline in #Rstar by 2050 (& even beyond) #AEs in aggregate; + also v interesting indiv cntries esp USA pic.twitter.com/y2Zw5XxsEY
The case of #HurricaneHarvey illustrates this point nearly perfectly! 'The @DallasFed has repeatedly reported surging or elevated auto sales in its district, after Hurricane Harvey-related floods ruined vehicles and homes.'https://t.co/qjvDxuPbJW
Dr. Ashton Carter spoke to DARPA's "Wait, What? A Future Technology Forum" on September 9, 2015 in St. Louis, MO, the city where the famous Lewis & Clark expedition began in 1804, the site of the St Louis World's Fair a century later, and the city whose spirit was the inspiration for Charles Lindbergh's plane The Spirit of St Louis, in which he crossed the Atlantic solo in 1927. It is also the site of a Boeing plant which the Secretary visited earlier in the day.
The full text of the Secretary's remarks is available here, I found the following excerpt is particularly inspiring:
"...our strength also comes from the longstanding link between the technology community and the government, and that's why I've made building and rebuilding the bridges between us one of my core goals as secretary of defense. Because, going forward, we need the best people, the best technology and the best innovation to remain the world's finest fighting force. Over most of the last 75 years, the bonds between us have been remarkable close. I've observed that from -- seen it from both sides. As a technologist myself, and also serving a number of times in the Defense Department. But while our ties have endured through successes and strains, the challenges and opportunities we face today demand we strengthen our partnership, and it has to be in ways that benefit both of us. We live in a changing world, and our military's excellence is not a birthright. It's not a guarantee. We have to earn it again and again." (emphasis added)
Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter is the second person with a PhD in physics to hold the post, Harold Brown having been the first, while his mentor, Dr. William Perry, who held the post 1994-97, was a mathematics PhD. But he is also majored in Medieval History at Yale, and was a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford, during which time he earned his PhD in theoretical physics. He is truly an inspiring figure in many ways.
MT @chrisquigg If confirmed, Ash Carter would be 2nd Physics PhD as #secretaryofdefense. Harold Brown was 1st; William Perry was Math PhD.
Professor Zvi Bodie of Boston University and Professor Marie Briere of Amundi were awarded the 2015 Harry H. Markowitz Prize by the Journal of Investment Management, for their paper on Sovereign Wealth Funds and Risk Management.
Dr. David Newland of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission was the Program Chair, with Poong-Eil Juhn of the Republic of Korea as Co-Chair. After an Opening and Introductory session, the second Session was on Experiences and Preparation for SMR Deployment, in which 8 Member States (MSs) of the IAEA - in alphabetical order: Canada, China, France, India, Japan, Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation and the USA presented the status of their national licensing and safety programs for SMR licensing. There were two presentations from the USA - one each from the Department of Energy (USDOE) and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC).
This was followed by a Panel Discussion on Licensing and Safety Issues for SMRs (with Dr. David Newland of Canada, R. Seban of France, M. Ricotti of Italy, S-H Rhee of Korea, and I. Bylov of the Russian Federation as panelists). The conferees then broke out into 5 groups whose topics the organizers had circulated beforehand: (1) Designs;
(2) Siting ;
(3) Graded Approach in regulatory and licensing process;
(4) Legal
(5) Public Participation, each of which was briefed by their Group Leader in Session 3, prior to breakout. Session 4 was devoted to presentations from International Organizations: ASME, OECD-NEA, WENRA, and WNA.
In Session 5, the Group Leaders of the Breakout Sessions reported back (1. Soderholm, 2. deVos, 3. Ramakrishna and 4. Magruder), and Session 6 concluded with reports from: Mr. M.H. Subki of the IAEA on the questionnaire distributed to participants, Dr. Daniel Ingersoll on a summary of the plenary sessions; a Meeting Summary by the Program Chair Dr. David Newland; and a final word each from Z. Drace of INPRO and J.K. Park of the NENP/IAEA.
The final report on the 6th INPRO Dialogue Forum on Licensing and Safety Issues for SMRs is available here.